Winrod, Gerald B. (1935). Adam Weishaupt: A Human Devil. https://archive.org/details/awhd_20190629/page/n3/mode/2up
‘The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.’ – Benjamin Disraeli
From the books we have studied so far the decade or so leading up to the French Revolution in 1789 has emerged as a critical period in the development of communism and the New Word Order; and Adam Weishaupt is clearly the key protagonist in the unleashing of the bloodshed and untramelled madness of that era, and the manufactured wars and revolutions that were to follow (American Civil War, Chinese opium wars, Boer War, WWI, Russian Revolution, WWII, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. etc. – indeed almost every major war of the last three centuries). This period also saw the American War of Independence (1776) and the Vatican’s abolition of the Jesuit order (1773). George Bernard Shaw observed that the world fundamentally changed in 1790. A clear picture of how the principal actors – the Jesuits, the Freemasons, the Rothschilds and other Jews, and Weishaupt – has seemed tantalisingly within reach, yet somehow still unattainable. Gerald Winrod’s Adam Weishaupt: A Human Devil significantly clarifies and enriches the situation. Questions surrounding the connections of the Illuminati (Weishaupt’s order, founded in 1776) with Marx’s Communist Manifesto (1848), the influence of the Jesuits and Illuminati on Freemasonry, and the place of the Jews in all of this, seem very much worth answering, give the global influence of all these groups on the NWO chaos of our time.
Weishaupt was born in 1748, was schooled by Jesuits from the age of seven, and trained as a Jesuit, becoming Professor of Canon Law at the Jesuit-controlled Ingolstadt University at a comparatively young age. The Pope dissolved the Jesuit order in 1773 on the orders of the governments of France, Spain, Portugal, Naples and Austria. Whether Weishaupt stayed loyal to the Jesuits is debatable, but he stayed on at Ingolstadt till the suppression of his Illuminati order in 1785. If we are looking for clues to the Illuminati’s proclivity for violence and bloodshed, which came to the fore in the Reign of Terror, as described in Carlyle’s book on the revolution (one detail: they had portable guillotines for taking care of the smaller towns: citizens who even looked like they might be of bourgeois sympathies were grabbed off the street and beheaded – these included the great chemist Lavoisier – it was madness) then the Jesuits seem a good place to start. Winrod is in no doubt that Weishaupt thoroughly absorbed and continued to be influenced by the Jesuits’ teachings:
Weishaupt may have tried conscientiously to separate himself from the Jesuits but the early influence of the Order lingered with him throughout his life. Even if he did divorce himself from the visible organization, he had already assimilated its intangible principles. That he drew upon the Jesuits for methods and nomenclature is readily admitted by careful students of the man and his work … Gould, in his History of Freemasory, remarks, ‘He (Weishaupt) had unconsciously imbibed that most pernicious doctrine that the end justifies the means’.
‘The end justifies the means‘ could be the motto of the modern NWO cabal. Think of the DEW attacks on the 9/11 twin towers, Maui, and the town of Lytton in Canada; the weather weapons attacks on China and California; the earthquake attack on Turkey; the mass slaughter of young and old, rich and poor in France, Russia, Cambodia and China (the CCP was largely founded by the Jews in 1920, some of them Bolsheviks carrying on the work they had just initiated in Russia – see here); and so on ad nauseam. The Jesuits had been founded in 1541 by Ignatius Loyola, as a military wing of the Catholic Church tasked with taking the fight to the Protestants after the Reformation. Winrod discusses two Jesuit atrocities, one potential and one actual, namely the London Gun Powder plot of 1605, where more than a ton of gun powder stored in the basement would have destroyed the King and the members of Parliament; and the massacre of the Huguenots on Sunday, August 24, 1572. Winrod tells the story:
It was on the day of St. Bartholomew—a quiet Sunday in Paris. Suddenly the bells of the St. Germain began to ring. I shall never forget the chill that came over me as I walked through the door of this building for the first time, realizing as I did that this was the place where the signal was given to massacre the Protestants. Like a cat springs upon an unsuspecting bird, so the Jesuits sprang upon the defenceless Protestants. Coligny, the leader of the Huguenots, was among those put to death in this awful orgy of blood. From Paris, the massacre soon spread to other cities, and it has been estimated that no less than one hundred thousand Protestants were wiped out.
I had no inkling of this kind of thing in my six years of Jesuit schooling. I suspect the Jesuit priests may be like the Freemasons, where only the top 3% are aware of what is actually going on. It was a humanistic education, the opposite of the inhumanity of the rest of the the Great Reset crew. Remarkably, the majority of the first Jesuits were Jews, perhaps of the diaspora following their expulsion from Spain in 1492. They would have been Marranos i.e. Jews pretending to be Catholics. This pretence may have been extremely consequential.
Weishaupt organised it – you have to hand it to him – so that his Illuminati infiltrated and began to control the principal Masonic lodges of Europe. Winrod quotes Professor Robison’s interpretation of Illuminism’s takeover of European Freemasonry:
We assert with confidence, that the Mason lodges in France were hot-beds where the seeds were sown, and tenderly reared, of all the pernicious doctrines which soon after choked every moral or religious cultivation, and have made the Society worse than a waste, have made it a noisome marsh of human corruption filled with every rank and poisonous weed.
In 1856 Disraeli gave a speech to the House of Commons in which he said:
It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe—the whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries—is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government; they do not want ameliorated institutions. They want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments.
The last sentence is especially alarming. ‘Put an end to ecclesiastical establishments’ suggests the current violent suppressions of churches in Ukraine and Canada, and during the COVID lockdowns. ‘Drive out the present owners of the soil’ resonates with the attempts to remove native peoples in Australia, New Zealand and Canada from their lands. ‘Change the tenure of land’ suggests the Great Reset, where ‘you will own nothing’ – the DEW attack onMaui is perhaps the most recent example of this.
The Illuminists’ proclivity for murder resonates strongly with the contemporary NWO – witness the life’s work of Henry Kissinger and the Clintons’ murder count, now up to 53. Winrod observes:
From documents which fell into the hands of the German government it has been discovered that his [Weishaupt’s] organization possessed dreadful poisons and had no hesitation about using them when to do so might serve to silence an enemy or advance their cause in other ways … They had a powder which produced blindness, a prescription of a poison which had an insidiously slow but deadly effect, the formula for another poison which ‘devoured everything’ when sprayed into the face, etc.
Winrod tantalisingly says that Weishaupt ‘suddenly became very rich,’ and that there were abundant funds available to finance the French Revolution. Other investigators have explicitly said that the Rothschilds bankrolled the Illuminati. This would become a pattern of behaviour, the next major example of which would be the Rothschilds’ funding of both sides in the American Civil War. And let us not forget the interesting theory that the Rothschilds’ may have rescued the British Royal Family in 1815 after they had lost everything in the Napoleonic wars, in exchange for breeding rights. King Charles, who looks and speaks nothing like Prince Philip, but very much like Lord Jacob Rothschild, is my Exhibit A.
Certainly, there was a massive Jewish influence on the Illuminati. Winrod says:
The real conspirators behind the Illuminati were Jews. Confiscated documents of the organization disclose that of the thirty-nine chief sub-leaders of Weishaupt, seventeen were Jews. Illuminati Hall of Ingolstadt, where Weishaupt lived, was later transformed into a synagogue … The Jewish method of exhausting their Gentile environment has always been to stir up strife from secret sources and engender class hatreds … In indicting his own race, Lazare says, ‘The complaint of the anti-Semites seems to be founded: the Jew has the revolutionary spirit; consciously or not he is an agent of revolution.’
‘Stir up strife from secret sources and engender class hatreds’ resonates strongly with the modern NWO. The great G. Edward Griffin found that the Communist books and pamphlets of the 1920s specifically identified racial division as a means by which they could bring down the USA. In this they have largely succeeded – George Floyd and the straw man of ‘white supremacy’ being prime examples. Winrod discusses the influence of the Jew Cagliostro, who ‘was in the inner circle of the Illuminati and had much to do with wrecking European Masonry and changing it into an instrument for producing carnage.’
There is a remarkable correspondence between the fundamental propositions of Illuminism and the ten points in Marx’s Communist Manifesto (1848). The Illuminist propositions are:
1. Abolition of all ordered government
2. Abolition of inheritance
3. Abolition of private property
4. Abolition of patriotism
5. Abolition of family
6. Abolition of religion
Here we can trace a clear line from Weishaupt to the Communist Manifesto to Communism as it exists today. We have seen that the League of Just Men who conscripted Mark to write the Manifesto may have been remnants of the Illuminati. Winrod supports this interpretation. He says: ‘Therefore, what we know as Communism today is the lineal descendant of the same anti-Christ conspiracy that brought about the French Revolution.’ Marx came from a long line of rabbis. Professor F. J. C. Hearnshaw wrote of him:
He was intolerant, bitter, violent, venomous. . . . Nor was his ferocious intolerance a mere superficial defect of manner. It penetrated to the depths of his being and vitiated all his. thought. He was entirely lacking in the scientific spirit, totally incapable of dispassionate argument. His inflamed emotions determined his conclusion, and his perverted intelligence put forth all its powers, with a complete disregard of all moral scruples, to provide an apparently rational foundation for them. . . Marx’s eminence is that of the agitator, not that of the thinker. He did not make socialism scientific; he made it predatory.
I suggest it is noteworthy that two of Marx’s daughters committed suicide. he was what Americans like to call a ‘bum,’ unemployed for his whole life, dependent on Engels for funds. Winrod concludes:
Therefore, we discover that Communism is not a new thing. We have followed it back in a straight line to the year 1776. But even now, we have not traced it to its historic source … It resulted from centuries of under-cover Jewish planning. Its final objective is to exhaust the. human family in suffering and misery until the whole world can be brought under the heel of the merciless Jew-ocracy of Moscow which has been aptly called THE RED BEAST.
As I write Elon Musk is sueing the Anti-Defamation League for their interference in the affairs of X. The ADL’s m. o. is to monitor the media for any investigation of the powerful forces we have been examining and then to shut them down by accusing them of anti-semitism. This has to stop. If there are personages pulling the strings of our elected leaders then we want to know about them. The antipathy toward the Jews is for political reasons, not racial or religious. The puppet-masters we have been discussing are wealthy and powerful almost beyond belief. In a recent tweet the Jew Stephen Miller said:
Thank you Stephen Miller and all your fellow Jews who have enlisted for the fight against evil. To name just a few: Naomi Wolf, Jane Ruby, Roseanne Barr, Ben Fulford, the late Zev Zelenko, Henry Makow. Thank you.