Ford, Henry. The International Jew – The World’s Foremost Problem. 1920. Dearborn Independent Publishing.
The International Jew is a series of articles written by Henry Ford, and published in The Dearborn Independent in the 1920s. Written after the momentous events of the Great War and the Peace Conference, when the activities of a cabal of powerful Jews, backed by reserves of phenomenal wealth, had commanded attention, it is an astonishing work, detailed and courageous and full of unflinching integrity. Detailed, as it goes into great depth in its 645 pages, covering subjects such as control of the press, the Russian revolution, and global finance and economics. Ford was certainly a master of his subject. Courageous, in that his project risked failure from unjustified charges of antisemitism (the editors of The Dearborn Independent deserve credit for this also). Integrity, in that Ford does not flinch from telling truths that may be unpleasant to many ears – for example, the support widely felt in the USA for the Russian Bolshevik revolution.
Ford devotes a chapter to the question of antisemitism, and concludes that it arises for political rather than racial or religious reasons. As I have said before, and as Ford emphasises, the momentous problem facing the contemporary world is not with the ordinary Jews – the decent family and business people, the writers and musicians and artists and film makers, the professionals and scientists and innovators who have contributed so much to the world – but with the Jews with one world government ambitions, who comprise the cabal, Khazarian Mafia, Sabbatean Frankists, Illuminati etc (we know them by many names), together with their Gentile lackeys and henchmen, and who are backed by the immense wealth of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and international banksters, of Soros, Gates, Fint, and so on. The potential accusation of antisemitism is further weakened by the likelihood that the perpetrators of much of the mischief are in fact Khazarian Jews who, as Ben Fulford likes to point out (benjaminfulford.net) are not authentic Jews, but converts, who embraced Judaism in bad faith in the eighth century, for political reasons. (On a personal note, I have written a book on the films of the Coen Brothers, in which I argue for the value of the Jewish spiritual heritage. The cabal would seem to lack appreciation for this or any other spiritual heritage.)
The international Jews and their ambitions are eminently deserving of exposure, but they have been protected by the shield, upraised at every opportunity by the Anti-Defamation League and the cabal-controlled corporate media, of the Holocaust. This has to stop. The funding of the Nazis and building of the death camps by the Anglo-American establishment (comprising international Jews and their Gentile agents) is a story I will tell at a later time. So much of what we have been told about modern history indeed is lies.
Here arguably is lie #1: Central to Ford’s thesis is the authenticity of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a collection of twenty-four documents which has been widely interpreted to this day as as a forgery, intended to discredit the Jews. Ford proffers evidence that the document is in fact genuine – for example, the word Jew appears only twice, which is odd if it was intended to stir up anti-Jewish feeling, and it lacks any hint of exhortation or passion, having more of the disinterested feel of lecture notes – and that it was likely to have been written in 1896. Ford observes:
But all through the documents there is left no doubt as to the people against whom the plan is aimed. It is not aimed against aristocracy as such. It is not aimed against capital as such. It is not aimed against government as such ... It is aimed against the people of the world who are called "Gentiles." It is the frequent mention of "Gentiles" that really decides the purpose of the documents … this plan aims at the degeneration of the people in order that they may be reduced to confusion of mind and thus manipulated … The formula of speech is not, "We Jews will do this," but "The Gentiles will be made to think and do these things." With the exception of a few instances in the closing Protocols, the only distinctive racial term used is "Gentiles."
Protocols is a blueprint for a one world government, with the the Gentiles and other races of the world subjugated to the control of the Jews. It is remarkable for the light it throws on world events up to its time of writing (1896), and the events it predicted to occur in the twenty-five years to the time of Ford’s writing of The International Jew, foremost of which was the Great War. Further, the Protocols map remarkably closely to the globalist phenomena we have witnessed since the end of WWII. Compare Heinz (Henry) Kissinger’s statement that: ‘The ordinary people will no more be able to rebel against us than a sheep can rebel against the farmer,’ with this passage from the first Protocol:
In this divergence between Gentiles and ourselves in ability to think and reason is to be seen clearly the seal of our election as the chosen people, as higher human beings, in contrast with the Gentiles who have merely instinctive and animal minds. They observe, but they do not foresee, and they invent nothing (except perhaps material things). It is clear from this that nature herself predestined us to rule and guide the world.
This sense of superiority is I believe the great weakness of the cabal, which may well see its defeat. This passage might cause us to rethink the conventional history of the French and Russian revolutions:
On the ruins of the hereditary aristocracy of the Gentiles we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class, and over all the aristocracy of money Already in ancient times we were the first to shout the words, 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,' among the people. These words have been repeated many times by unconscious poll-parrots, flocking from all sides to this bait, with which they have ruined the prosperity of the world and true personal freedom …
France and Russia are both fundamentally Christian countries, and the intention to annihilate Christianity is expressed in Protocol 17:
We have taken good care long ago to discredit the Gentile clergy and thereby to destroy their mission, which at present might hamper us considerably. Their influence over the people diminishes daily. Freedom of conscience has been proclaimed everywhere. Consequently it is only a question of time when the complete crash of the Christian religion will occur.
Think, for example, of the closure of the churches, while the bottle shops were allowed to remain open, during the lockdowns of 2020-2022; of Juval Noah Harari’s ‘Jesus Christ is fake news’; of the repeated arrests of pastor Artur Pawlowski in Canada. There is much more. Leo Zagami has persuasively argued in his Confessions of an Illuminati 7 (which I have reviewed) that the installation of Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was always intended to destroy the papacy and the Church.
Dr. John Coleman in his book The Rothschild Dynasty, which I have reviewed, makes a case for the immanence of the ‘hidden hand’ of the international Jews behind the French revolution. For the same reason, the chapter on the Russian revolution is one of the most fascinating in The International Jew. Trotsky’s Jewishness has never been questioned: his birth name was Braunstein. Kerensky instigated the March revolution, which was succeeded by the Bolshevik revolution in October. ‘It [The Jewish coup] began,’ Ford writes, ’with Kerensky compelling the Czar to lay aside his crown.’ Kerensky’s parents were both Jewish, by name Adler – his mother married a Russian upon the death of his father. Lenin has always been upheld as a Gentile, thereby throwing the real nature of the coup into doubt. Ford comments:
Perhaps he [Lenin] is [a Gentile], but why do his children speak Yiddish? Why are his proclamations put forth in Yiddish? Why did he abolish the Christian Sunday and establish by law the Jewish Saturday Sabbath? The explanation of all this may be that he married a Jewess. The fact is that he did. But another explanation may be that he himself is a Jew. Certainly he is not the Russian nobleman he has always claimed to be. The statements he has made about his identity thus far have been lies. The claim that he is a Gentile may be unfounded also.
The mention of Yiddish here indicates the Khazarian Jews, who were not of the Abrahamic line, but converted to Judaism for political reasons, and in bad faith, retaining their bloody Babylonian cultural practices. The Khazarians have been throughout history notoriously destructive. So also have the Bolsheviks; and so it appears that the Jews behind the Bolshevik revolution may have been Khazarians. Hence the term ‘Khazarian Mafia,’ commonly used for the cabal. In regard to Jewish control of the Press, Ford quotes Baron Moses Montefiore: ‘As long as we do not have the press of the whole world in our hands, everything you may do is vain. We must control or influence the papers of the whole world in order to blind and deceive the people.’ Ford comments:
By “blinding” the people he only meant that they should not see the Jew, and by “deceiving” them he only meant that the people should think certain world movements meant one thing when they really meant another. The people may be told what happens: they may not be told what was behind it. The people do not yet know why certain occurrences which have affected their whole lives, should have occurred at all. But the “why” of it is very definitely known in certain circles whose news service never sees print, and sometimes not even writing.
The Jeffrey Epstein saga has thrown light on the question of blackmail of public figures. That not a single visitor to ‘Epstein’s island’ has been exposed, still less has faced trial, remarkably suggests the Jewish control of the press and judiciary. Ford notes that bribery is a typical Jewish m. o. So too is blackmail:
We will manipulate the election of Presidents whose past contains some undisclosed dark affair, some 'Panama,' then they will be faithful executors of our orders from fear of exposure and from the natural desire of every man who has attained a position of authority to retain the privileges, emoluments and the dignity associated with the position of President.
The manipulation of ideas is another key aspect of the Jewish m. o. Protocol 2 says: ‘Note the successes we have arranged in Darwinism, Marxism, and Nietzscheism. The demoralizing effect of these doctrines upon the minds of the Gentiles should be evident at least to us.’ Protocol 10 says: ‘To wear everyone out by dissensions, animosities, feuds, famine, inoculation of diseases, want, until the Gentiles see no other way of escape except an appeal to our money and power.’ (This is explicitly the strategy of The Great Reset). Ford observes: ‘The idea is the weapon. And to be a weapon it must be an idea at variance with the natural trend of life.’ Darwinism and Nietzscheism (‘God is dead’) have eroded faith in the Christian God. Marxism has torn nations apart. The awakened strongly suspect that gender fluidity, white supremacy and the slavery issue have been deliberately heated up. We know that Soros has been funding Black Lives Matter. The object of all of these is to confuse, divide and conquer.
This review covers only volume 1 of Henry Ford’s The International Jew, and merely scratches the surface of a meticulously detailed work of historical scholarship. Further volumes deal with the Jews in American finance, business, industry, politics and education; Jewish influences on American cultural life; and aspects of Jewish power in the USA. I cannot recommend it too highly.
Henry Ford’s The International Jew may be obtained from abebooks.com at an exorbitant price. It appears to have been suppressed from Amazon, though many books taking the Ford-as-antisemite line have not. It may be read online here, or downloaded in pdf form from here.
Update 26 Dec 2022:
Concerning the idea as weapon: Katherine Watt (Bailiwick News) has posted the following in her substack blog:
Below are a few of the bits and pieces relevant to the connections between Christianity and human rights — why Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and other globalist politicians go out of their way to condemn “baskets of deplorables” who “cling to guns and religion” — and how important it is for the globalist predators to cut us off from the moral foundations we’ve inherited from Christianity and the divinely-inspired US Constitution.
…My working hypothesis, strongly informed by Malachi Martin’s analysis in The Keys of This Blood (1990) is that the globalists captured the populist left by forming an alliance of convenience between transnational capital (the banksters) and Marxist social justice/secular materialist warriors, using money (George Soros et al funding the Black Lives Matter groups and color revolutions of the world) alongside ideological persuasion that their joint Enemy No. 1 is Christian Constitutionalists with a commitment to individual liberty and federalism as a means of securing it.