‘In Khazaria, sheep, honey, and Jews exist in large quantities.’ - Mugaddasi, Descriptio Imperii Moslemici (tenth century).
Koestler, Arthur. 1976. The Thirteenth Tribe. Random House.
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994), seventh leader of the Chabad-Lubovitch dynasty, considered the most violent and destructive branch of Jewry, is described by chabad.org as ‘the one individual more than any other singularly responsible for stirring the conscience and spiritual awakening of world Jewry.’ There is a famous photo (Fig. 1) of a young Bill Gates worshipping at his feet.
Fig, 1 A young Bill Gates and the Chabad-Lubovitch leader Rabbi Schneerson
Schneerson in a speech in 1994 had this to say about Ukraine and the Khazarians:
Slav, Russian, can be destroyed, but never conquered. That is why this seed is subject to liquidation, and, at first, a sharp reduction in their numbers … Looking back in history, it must be admitted that these lands are the ancient ancestral lands of the Jewish Khazaria, that is Israel, captured by Kiev’s Rus [the ancient state of Russia with the capital in Kiev] in the tenth century. The Slavs are temporary guests on these lands and are subject to eviction. We will return this territory, and build the Great Khazaria – the Jewish state – on these fertile lands the same way as, 50 years ago, we created Israel, squeezing the Palestinians out. Israelis will partially relocate here, and we will drive Slavic cattle out far to the north, beyond Moscow. There will be a small Northern Territory, a reservation with a compact population — a reservation, like Indian reservations in America.
This quote draws together four key themes of the contemporary mayhem:
the identification by many commentators of Ukraine as the head of the NWO snake
the planned mutual destruction of Israel and the Islamic lands, as described in the letter from the 33 degree Freemason Albert Pike to the Illuminist leader Giuseppe Mazzini in 2871, with the relocation of the Israeli survivors to Ukraine
the press-ganging of Ukrainian civilians, including the old, the young, and women, into the Ukranian army to be sent to almost certain deaths against Russia, arguably for the purpose of depopulation of the native population, to make room for the later arrivals
the development of bioweapons in Ukrainian laboratories, so Russia has argued, specifically targeted against the Slavic races -- this was the most important justification for the Special Military Operation
‘The Deep State is panicking’ often seems to me to be mere wishful thinking. However, there is indeed arguably a note of desperation in Nathaniel Rothschild’s recent letter (Nov 2023) to the UK parliament (this has been fact-checked as fake, so is highly likely to be authentic):
Vladimir Putin is the most dangerous man since the defeat of Hitler, with Xi Jinping a close second … Ukraine is an essential piece that we cannot afford to lose, in the geopolitical chessboard …Russia must be excised from the international banking and economic system. We must bring Russia to its knees through any means possible, to send a strong signal to the Chinese and to protect our global system of norms and liberal values … if we allow Vladimir Putin to seize Ukraine, it will send a signal to our enemies, Iran, China and North Korea especially, that we will do nothing when faced with an onslaught of force.
Notable here are the chilling threat of ‘by any means possible’; the staggering hypocrisy of Rothschild’s reference to ‘liberal values’; and the confirmation of the alliance of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea. What then is the validity of the Khazarians’ identity as Jews, and of their claims to a Ukrainian homeland? Arthur Koestler goes a long way towards answering these questions in his very well-researched and readable book The Thirteenth Tribe.
Let us cut to the scene of the Khazars’ famous conversion to Judaism around 740 CE: The Khazars’ homeland at that time was the territory north of the Caucasus between the Black and Caspian Seas, which included, yes, the modern Ukraine; and to that extent Rabbi Schneerson’s claim may be justified. After the defeat of the Persian Empire by the swarming Muslim ascendancy in 651 CE, the eastern world was dominated by the the three great powers of Islam, the Holy Roman Empire, and Khazaria (Fig. 2), which was an ally and adversary of the former two at different times.
Fig. 2 The kingdom of Khazaria c. 8th century
The esteem in which Khazaria was held is indicated by the story of the three gold seals, which Koestler relates:
The Byzantine Emperor and historian, Constantine Porphyrogenitus (913- 959) … recorded in his treatise on court protocol. that letters addressed to the Pope in Rome, and similarly those to the Emperor of the West, had a gold seal worth two solidi attached to them, whereas messages to the King of the Khazars displayed a seal worth three solidi. This was not flattery, but Realpolitik.
Koestler judges the Khazarians to have had a profound effect on mediaeval and consequently modern Europe. And yet, compared to the cultures of Islam and Christianity, they were primitives, and they knew it. Their shamanism was outdated compared to the great monotheistic creeds, and gave their Kagan (king) little spiritual or legal authority compared to the Caliph and Holy Roman Emperor. (We may note in passing that the married name of Victoria Nuland, who directed the Maidan revolution in Ukraine in 2014, is Kagan; and there is a Kagan – the Obama-nominated Elena Kagan – on the Supreme Court of the United States). Yet to convert to Islam or Christianity would have meant for the Khazarians submission to a foreign authority. Conversion to Judaism then was the natural course to follow. The obvious point, which has profound implications for our understanding of the current situation, is that the Khazarians, originally of Turkic descent, and now globally the most numerous variety of Jews, are not of the seed of Abraham, not at all sons of Shem, but sons of Japheth. The pejorative term ‘anti-semitic,’ which the Anti-Defamation League and its media and political eunuchs hurl at any critic of the Israel-Ukraine project (of which the H word, 9/11 and Covid frauds are major tactics), is therefore vacuous and inane. The above reasoning applies equally as well to the Khazarian-derived Ashkenazi.
Leo Zagami argues that the Khazarians did not practice authentic Judaism, but rather Babylonian Talmudism, which featured child sacrifice and other bloody Babylonian rituals. Koestler does not go there, but argues that their form of Judaism was close to that of the heretical Karaites sect, which abjured rabbinical teachings and the Talmud. That the Khazarians did not practice traditional Judaism seems likely. In this vein, Koestler refers to an eleventh century Hebrew Karaite author, who explained the word mamzer, ‘bastard,’ by giving the example of the Khazars, who became Jews without belonging to the race. Zagami, several of whose books I have reviewed, is a highly expert scholar of the occult, and it seems likely that there was a line of transmission from the Khazars through the Sabbatean Frankists, those masters of destruction, to the murderous Illuminati and then the Marxist Communists, and finally the Zionists, the tragic results of whose attempted engineering of a World War III we are now witnessing. That the Zionists, led by Benjamin Netanyahu, have never practiced Judiasm, but rather Luciferianism, must now be considered beyond dispute.
Orthodox scholars state that the Khazars lost their lands and independence after their defeat by the Russians in 965 CE. Koestler argues, however, that they retained their empire and independence but within narrower limits, and continued to practice their faith until their overthrow by the Genghis Kahn and the Mongols in the mid-thirteenth century. Before and after this cataclysmic event they sent offshoots into the surrounding lands, and for Koestler, ‘Here, then, we have the cradle of the numerically strongest and culturally dominant part of modern Jewry.’ This is of course contested by scholars who would like to relegate the Khazarians to secondary importance, but Koestler argues compellingly to the contrary. The scholar-eunuchs agree that Khazars migrated westward into Poland, Lithuania and Germany after the Mongol victory, but maintain that they were in the minority compared to the semitics who migrated eastward from France and the Rhineland.
Koestler well describes the confusion that ignorance of Khazar history brought to scholars of the European Jews:
Yet east of the Rhine, in central and northern Germany, there were as yet no Jewish communities at all, and none for a long time to come. The traditional conception of Jewish historians that the Crusade of 1096 swept like a broom a mass-migration of German Jews into Poland is simply a legend - or rather an ad hoc hypothesis invented because, as they knew little of Khazar history, they could see no other way to account for the emergence, out of nowhere, of this unprecedented concentration of Jews in Eastern Europe. Yet there is not a single mention in the contemporary sources of any migration, large or small, from the Rhineland further east into Germany, not to mention distant Poland.
Linguistics provides evidence supportive of Koestler’s thesis. Yiddish, an amalgam of Hebrew, mediaeval German, Slavonic, and other influences, and the popular language of the Jewish masses, is moribund now, but was widely spoken before WWII in Germany, the United States, especially New York, and elsewhere. Some words have crept into mainstream English, for example scheister, chutzpah, klutz, schmooze, schmuck. The Three Stooges lapsed into Yiddish at different times in their movies :). Here is the critical evidence, as argued by the Khazar scholar Mieses:
No linguistic components derived from the parts of Germany bordering on France are found in the Yiddish language. Not a single word from the entire list of specifically Moselle-Franconian origin compiled by A. Ballas (Beitrage zur Kunntnis der Trierischen Volkssprache, 1903, 28ff.) has found its way into the Yiddish vocabulary. Even the more central regions of Western Germany, around Frankfurt, have not contributed to the Yiddish language.... Insofar as the origins of Yiddish are concerned, Western Germany can be written off....Could it be that the generally accepted view, according to which the German Jews once upon a time immigrated from France across the Rhine, is misconceived? The history of the German Jews, of Ashkenazi Jewry, must be revised. The errors of history are often rectified by linguistic research. The conventional view of the erstwhile immigration of Ashkenazi Jews from France belongs to the category of historic errors which are awaiting correction.
This is not what the Zionists want to hear, as it destroys the power of their ’anti-semitism’ trope. David Icke regards the Zionist deception as the greatest of all time. I disagree, I believe the H word fraud deserves that honour. But it’s a close contest. To recap the summary of H word fraud evidence from my last review: Yes, a great many people died in the camps, but the main cause of death was typhus, which had been exacerbated by the destruction of supply chains by the Allies’ carpet bombing of Germany. The camps were indeed labour camps, constructed by IG Farben and other global industrialists to provide labour for their factories. The sign Arbeit Macht Frei (Work Makes Free) on the gates of Auschwitz had a purpose, but it was not to fool the passengers on the trains. Zyklon B was indeed a disinfectant, as we know from its use on new arrivals in America in the 1920s, who were made to undress, sprayed with Zyklon B and showered, and then given their now fumigated clothes back, and were free to enter the country. Contemporary almanacs state that there were approximately the same number of Jews in the world (15 million) before and after the war. The famous Auschwitz chimney is not connected to any building or structure. It is fake, like the H word story itself.
We have noted in previous reviews the determinative influence of the Ashkenazim Jacob Schiff, Edward Mandell House, and Bernard Baruch, on the revolutions and wars of the twentieth century. The Zionists play a long game. I believe that when constructing the labour camps they may have already been looking forward to the H word fraud. Netanyahu, Zionist Chief Operating Officer, is almost certainly miles underground in a bunker somewhere watching the long planned Hamas-Israel conflict unfold, but maybe not with complete satisfaction. If Nathaniel Rothschild’s letter is genuine, as I believe it is, then for once I believe that, yes, the Deep State may be panicking.