‘Israel took control of U.S. foreign policy with no regard for U.S. interests. Israel’s influence on the U.S. is best described as that of a parasite …’ Laurent Guyénot
Guyénot, Laurent. 2021. The Unspoken Kennedy Truth.
First, I would encourage you to read my previous review of Concentration Camp Majdanek, which demonstrates beyond any doubt the fraudulent nature of the accepted H word narrative. The demolition of this narrative of genocide, which supports so many evils of the current world, would be the greatest gift that the truthers could give to the world. And it’s all there: it’s just a matter of dissemination.
Laurent Guyénot’s study of the John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) assassination is hardly less momentous. Countless books have been written on the subject, but they almost all intentionally or carelessly fail to explore a particular avenue of enquiry. Only the most naïve and uninformed could continue to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered JFK, or Sirhan Sirhan his brother Robert Francis Kennedy (RFK). The CIA is often mentioned as a culprit – for example, RFK Jr. recently took this line. The great contribution of The Untold Kennedy Truth is to explore the road less taken, namely the central role of Israel in the assassination. Guyénot argues compellingly that it was in fact Israel that murdered JFK, and then RFK for intending to reopen the enquiry into JFK’s death. Israel is the serial killer of this story. An aspect of this is the central role of President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) in the killings. LBJ and also the CIA’s James Jesus Angleton emerge from Guyénot’s study as Mossad operatives who were guilty of treason, the penalty for which is death.
Guyénot begins with the assassination of RFK, which should be seen as intentional act by the serial killer, and not as another expression of the mysterious ‘Kennedy curse,’ somehow ordained in the stars. JFK appointed his brother Bobby (RFK) as Attorney General after his election as president in 1960. JFK was assassinated on 23 November 1963, whereupon Johnson assumed the presidency. LBJ, who loathed the Kennedys, refused to have Bobby as his running mate, and Bobby determined to run for the presidency in 1972. This was brought forward to 1968 with the escalation of the war in Vietnam; however, he was assassinated in June 1968, before the November election, by a gunman – supposedly the Israel-hating Sirhan Sirhan – in the kitchen service pantry of the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Guyénot finds parallels between the murders of the brothers that might point toward a common perpetrator.
There is no doubt that RFK had determined to re-open the inquest into his brother’s death, which had identified Oswald as the killer, acting alone, and had under LBJ’s watch been concluded with indecent haste. He had personally interviewed both CIA Director John McCone and mobster Jimmy Hoffa, and was convinced that they knew nothing about it. However, he always suspected LBJ, of whom he memorably observed: ‘Johnson lies all the time, he just lies continuously, about everything. In every conversation I have with him, he lies … He lies even when he doesn’t have to.’ RFK then enlisted an MI6 operative to conduct hundreds of interviews in the US. Their report was ‘replete with innuendo about Lyndon Johnson and Texas oil barons.’ It was turned into a book, which concluded that JFK’s murder was ‘a stage trick, complete with accessories and fake mirrors, and when the curtain fell, the actors, and even the scenery, disappeared.’
Other investigators have determined that it was an impossibility for Sirhan Sirhan to have been the lone gunman as his gun had capacity for only eight shots, whereas a total of twelve were fired. Ballistic, forensic, and eyewitness evidence show that none of Sirhan’s bullets hit Kennedy, who was hit by three bullets, all shot from behind him; yet twelve eyewitnesses said that he never turned his back on Sirhan. And so on. You get the picture. Sirhan’s conviction was a travesty. Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard hired for the evening, has emerged as the prime suspect, but his weapon was never examined, and he was never interrogated.
There is strong expert and eyewitness evidence that Sirhan was hypnotised at the time of the killing, and the infamous CIA MK-Ultra program, an overwhelmingly Jewish enterprise which attempted to answer such questions as ‘Can a person under hypnosis be forced to commit murder?’comes into focus behind the events of that night. Sirhan was exceptionally easy to hypnotise. He was born into a Christian family, yet the mainstream media peddled the propagandised message that he was a Palestinian terrorist who hated Israel, and RFK’s supposed love for Israel became the motive for the killing. Yet the evidence that RFK was an Israel sympathiser is very weak. Sirhan would become the prototype of the Muslim terrorists who were claimed to have committed 9/11. This is all very advantageous to Israel, but it is not sufficient to inculpate them for the murder. Guyénot posits:
The motive for Robert’s assassination must be found, not in what Robert publicly declared in a synagogue during his presidential campaign, but rather in what he confided only to his closest friends, his intention to reopen the investigation on his brother’s death.
Guyénot then asks: ‘What would a real investigation, conducted under the supervision of Robert in the White House, have revealed?’ First up in any answer must be the Lee Harvey Oswald-as-lone-gunman position, which has been thoroughly refuted by many investigators. He was in truth a patsy, and certainly never fired a bullet on that day, as he himself publicly claimed before Jack Ruby had the chance to kill him. There were probably at least eight snipers, many of whom missed before the fatal bullet was fired from the ‘grassy knoll’ in Dealey Plaza, Dallas. The ‘CIA did it’ theory looms largest, as force multiplied by countless books and films, including Oliver Stone’s film JFK, released in 1991. JFK was produced by Arnon Milchan, who has been described as ‘one of the most important covert agents that Israel has ever fielded.’ Milchan was especially involved in furthering Israel’s nuclear program, which is of immense significance vis-à-vis JFK, as we shall see. Another significant promoter of the CIA-did-it theory was Alan Weberman with his 1975 book Coup d’État in America: The CIA and the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. Guyénot quotes the Jewish daily Forward to the effect that Weberman had dual American-Israeli citizenship and was ‘a close associate of Jewish Defense Organization founder Mordechai Levi, whose fringe group is a spin-off of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane’s militant right-wing Jewish Defense League.’
An enquiry under RFK would have revealed three reasons why Israel would have wished to assassinate his brother. The most significant concerns Israel’s nuclear capability, which they were developing at the Dimona site. David Ben-Gurion saw the nuclear option in existential terms, as preventing Palestine from re-occupying its lands by force, and so destroying the Israel project. Yet JFK’s aim of global nuclear disarmament would have sabotaged this. Nothing was more important to Israel than its nuclear option. Professor Avner Cohen described it this way:
In the eyes of the Israelis, there was no undertaking that was more important, more secretive, more costly, more existential—more sacred—than the nuclear project. Everything is kosher, everything is OK, in order to make it happen. Everything. It was almost like a religious commitment to make it happen. The bomb is a way to ensure survival after the Holocaust.
A second major reason for Israeli’s murder of JFK may be found in his attitude toward the Arab world. JFK had a great admiration for the Egyptian president Abdul Gamal Nasser, the hero of Arab nationalism, and in letters to Nasser and other Arab Heads of State he committed himself to supporting U.N. Resolution 194 for the right of return of Palestinian refugees. This was Ben-Gurion’s response:
Israel will regard this plan as a more serious danger to her existence than all the threats of the Arab dictators and kings, than all the Arab armies, than all of Nasser’s missiles and his Soviet MIGs .. Israel will fight against this implementation down to the last man.
Finally, JFK was attempting to force the American Zionist Council (AZC) to register as a foreign agent, which would have considerably hindered its abiiity, through its lobbying division American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC – it is still very active) to influence and corrupt US politicians. Ben-Gurion knew that Israel could not achieve its objectives without the support of Washington.
Guyénot emphasises that the point of the 23 November coup was to install LBJ as president; and he did not disappoint, as he reversed all of JFK’s policies to which the Israelis had objected. The Dimona nuclear project was allowed to go ahead unhindered. Economic aid to Egypt was cancelled, and military aid was given to Israel on a grand scale. Moves to limit the power of AZC and AIPAC were withdrawn. The American people were kept in the dark about these policy changes.
LBJ had ‘a personal and often emotional connection to Israel’ (5 Towns Jewish Times, 2013). Further, he was almost certainly Jewish himself. I argued the same about Churchill in my review of Martin Gilbert’s Churchill and the Jews. LBJ was deeply influenced by his aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. Both of his great-grandparents on the maternal side (of his mother Rebekah Baines) were Jewish. ‘The line of Jewish mothers can be traced back three generations in Lyndon Johnson’s family tree. There is little doubt that he was Jewish’ (5 Towns Jewish Times, 2013).
LBJ’s election to the Senate in 1948 by a handful of votes, where he gained the sobriquet ‘landslide Lyndon,’ was a fraud managed by Abraham Fortas. His campaign had been financed by Democratic fundraiser Abraham Feinberg, who had also founded Americans for Haganah, the biggest fundraising organisation for the Jewish militia. Guyénot concludes that ‘Johnson had been at Israel’s service from the beginning of his political life.’ The Zionist m. o. is visible here, as it is in Mandell House’s identification and patronage of Woodrow Wilson, who would be their man to get the U.S. into WWI.
LBJ’s treachery was most on display in the USS Liberty affair. Together with Israel, he determined to destroy Nasser and Egypt. In the kind of Zionist false flag attack with which we have become so familiar, on 8 June 1967 the USS Liberty, an unarmed spy ship stationed in international waters off Sinai, was attacked by several unmarked Mirage jets, and Mystère fighter-bombers dropping napalm, and torpedoed by three Israeli-flagged PT boats. The obvious intent of the attackers was to sink the USS Liberty and leave no survivors. The intention was, had it succeeded, to blame Egypt, and so justify America’s intervention on the side of Israel. However, the attempted sinking failed. Israel later confessed, claiming it was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ and ‘targeting error.’ The enquiry was a travesty, and the survivors were warned not to speak of the affair, under the threat of the ‘most severe reprisal.’ Guyénot sums up: ‘what changed under Johnson is not that the U.S. started protecting Israel as if it were a part of the United States, but that Israel took control of U.S. foreign policy with no regard for U.S. interests. Israel’s influence on the U.S. is best described as that of a parasite …’ This is the very definition of treason.
There is substantial evidence that LBJ may have been the mastermind behind the assassination. Eddie Fisher said that Jackie Kennedy’s press secretary Pam Turnure told him that Jackie said: ‘Lyndon Johnson did it.’ Philip Nelson makes the case for LBJ’s culpability over 700 pages in his book The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010). Nelson quotes a previous biographer Robert Caro, for whom Johnson was a man thirsting
for power in its most naked form, for power not to improve the lives of others, but to manipulate and dominate them, to bend them to his will … a hunger so fierce and consuming that no consideration of morality or ethics, no cost to himself—or to anyone else—could stand before it.
This sounds very much like the world feeling of Henry Kissinger, Klaus Schwab, Yuval Noah Harari and other powerful and controlling Zionists we have come across, including the author of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which I believe to be an authentic document. The most compelling evidence is however that Jack Ruby and LBJ are the only two people to have taken active steps to silence Lee Harvey Oswald. Ruby fired the shot that wounded him (Fig. 3). As Oswald was progressing satisfactorily in hospital, LBJ phoned the surgeon, who had to leave the operating theatre to take the message, which was that he (LBJ) wanted a deathbed confession. The surgeon was stunned, as death was an outcome they had been successfully working to avoid. Before the call, a shadowy figure ‘looking like Oliver Hardy with a pistol hanging from his back pocket’ had entered the theatre. By the time the surgeon returned, the unknown figure had gone and Oswald had died from heart failure.
This review must be finished, but I shall return to Guyenot’s short but immensely rich book in Part 2, where we shall learn more about Jack Ruby (real name Jacob Rubinstein, who took orders from the Jewish mafia); the Mossad CIA plant James Jesus Angleton; the patriarch Joseph Kennedy, who had imbued John and Bobby with his own fundamental decency; the murder of former U.S. Secretary of Defense James Forestal, which may have foreshadowed JFK’s own; and more.